<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Education Resources</title>
	<link>http://www.oerderves.org/?p=38</link>
	<description>Musings on open educational resources by Mike, Cathy, Phoenix and Vic</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simonfj</title>
		<link>http://www.oerderves.org/?p=38#comment-5624</link>
		<dc:creator>simonfj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oerderves.org/?p=38#comment-5624</guid>
		<description>Thanks Marshall, Cathy,

I was going a bit bats after reading "we welcome your feedback, comments and discussion" at the top of this doc, and having nowhere to go. http://www.hewlett.org/NR/rdonlyres/5D2E3386-3974-4314-8F67-5C2F22EC4F9B/0/AReviewoftheOpenEducationalResourcesOERMovement_BlogLink.pdf

Do you think we could try and attempt to bring all the discussion which goes on on all HP's OER initiatives together? Blogs are one step and good as a way to respond to a report. But as John says in the doc, we have a "successful disaster" on our hands. "a teacher now has access to 100 elementary calculus courses' (and a thousand blogs). We need incentives and mechanisms to promote creation and access to fewer instances of the same course but with more support material, more commentary, more examples, etc"

I wouldn't even say we need "more commentary". We just need a way that, when HP/OER funded communities put a doc or report up, people are directed to a forum where a conversation can take place, and be followed if you come in a bit late. You've seen John D from OCWC attempt a forum, but because the incentive is for each silo to produce "me too" content rather than collaborate and produce a course together, we end up with so many half baked (institutional) pies rather one good quality pie, baked by a global (subject specific) group.

In short, we need a community hub(s). http://docs.moodle.org/en/Community_hub

It might look something like this COP forum, which is about 250 on Alexa's top 500. http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/
So long as each funded initiative is 'incentivated' to use it as a place to share what going on in their silo, I'm sure we might see the beginnings of a culture built around global communities rather than institutional repositories.

At least that's what we've found.
http://www.wikback.com/forums/
(PS This hub is only 3 months old)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Marshall, Cathy,</p>
<p>I was going a bit bats after reading &#8220;we welcome your feedback, comments and discussion&#8221; at the top of this doc, and having nowhere to go. <a href="http://www.hewlett.org/NR/rdonlyres/5D2E3386-3974-4314-8F67-5C2F22EC4F9B/0/AReviewoftheOpenEducationalResourcesOERMovement_BlogLink.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hewlett.org/NR/rdonlyres/5D2E3386-3974-4314-8F67-5C2F22EC4F9B/0/AReviewoftheOpenEducationalResourcesOERMovement_BlogLink.pdf</a></p>
<p>Do you think we could try and attempt to bring all the discussion which goes on on all HP&#8217;s OER initiatives together? Blogs are one step and good as a way to respond to a report. But as John says in the doc, we have a &#8220;successful disaster&#8221; on our hands. &#8220;a teacher now has access to 100 elementary calculus courses&#8217; (and a thousand blogs). We need incentives and mechanisms to promote creation and access to fewer instances of the same course but with more support material, more commentary, more examples, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even say we need &#8220;more commentary&#8221;. We just need a way that, when HP/OER funded communities put a doc or report up, people are directed to a forum where a conversation can take place, and be followed if you come in a bit late. You&#8217;ve seen John D from OCWC attempt a forum, but because the incentive is for each silo to produce &#8220;me too&#8221; content rather than collaborate and produce a course together, we end up with so many half baked (institutional) pies rather one good quality pie, baked by a global (subject specific) group.</p>
<p>In short, we need a community hub(s). <a href="http://docs.moodle.org/en/Community_hub" rel="nofollow">http://docs.moodle.org/en/Community_hub</a></p>
<p>It might look something like this COP forum, which is about 250 on Alexa&#8217;s top 500. <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/</a><br />
So long as each funded initiative is &#8216;incentivated&#8217; to use it as a place to share what going on in their silo, I&#8217;m sure we might see the beginnings of a culture built around global communities rather than institutional repositories.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve found.<br />
<a href="http://www.wikback.com/forums/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikback.com/forums/</a><br />
(PS This hub is only 3 months old)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
